Few lives can have been buffeted by the
winds of fortune as much as that lived by Cynthia Lennon who died yesterday
from cancer at her home in Spain, the latest in a long line of deaths of those
closely associated with The Beatles. I met her once, quite briefly, at the
opening of her restaurant – Lennon’s – in St Martin’s Lane in the late
eighties, and it always seemed to me that no matter how much she tried she
could never escape the shadow of the man she married in August 1962 and whose
son Julian was born to her the following April. Sometime in the eighties she
stopped trying, changing her surname back to Lennon by deed poll.
Cynthia
was, it seems, a nice girl, well brought up, well-mannered and well spoken, but
ill-suited for marriage to a man like John. I can’t help but think she’d have
been happier married to a dependable bloke of conservative outlook, perhaps a
clerk in the wages department at Liverpool Council or the assistant manager of
a local branch of Barclays on the Wirral.
In
the event she chose John, or John chose her, and life became a roller-coaster.
To have been married to a Beatle in the sixties would have placed her in the
eye of a cyclone from which there was never any hope of escape, simultaneously
euphoric and horrifying, and for her the ordeal was probably far more intense
than for the other Beatle WAGS; hidden away, virtually a single mother, married
to the most extreme Beatle, the most curious, the least conventional, the
leader of the gang, and too often uncertain of his whereabouts, let alone what
was going on inside his mind.
There
is a curious symmetry about how the four Beatles chose as their partners English
girls of solid backgrounds – John with Cynthia, Paul with Jane, Ringo with
Maureen, George with Pattie – but gradually exchanged them for American women –
John with Yoko (Japanese by birth, Yoko became a US citizen through her 1963 marriage
to Tony Cox), Paul with Linda, George with Olivia and, finally, Ringo with Barbara.
The newspaper coverage of Cynthia’s
passing has granted the right wing, middle-brow media yet another opportunity
to condemn John, a man whose philosophy was and will always be at odds with
their political leanings and puritanical social agenda. It is regrettable that Beatles biographer
Hunter Davis has been quoted as saying: “John treated her
appallingly. He slept with Yoko in their marital home and, as we discovered
later, he also physically attacked her, but she was loyal to him.” As far as I
can establish there is only one confirmed incident of John abusing Cynthia
physically, at an art school dance very early on in their relationship when he accused
her of flirting with another man. I’m not trying to excuse John here, but let’s
not blow this out of proportion by suggesting it was a recurrent theme of
their relationship. Amusingly, the Daily
Mail captioned one of their photographs: “The
couple… at home with Julian in Surrey in 1965 before drugs began to have a
destructive effect on the musician.” I always thought drugs had
a creatively liberating effect on John, altogether positive, and - heroin aside - quite the
opposite of ‘destructive’ in every way.
Anyway,
I’m sorry about Cynthia. It can’t have been easy. She was, by all accounts, a
wonderful mother to Julian. She was certainly John’s muse during the first
phase of The Beatles’ career and I was gladdened to read on the internet a warm tribute from
Yoko. She suffered for someone else’s art.
2 comments:
Nice tribute.
When I read Deborah Curtis' book, "Touching from a Distance", I thought of Cynthia. The first, early wives of such geniuses surely cannot begin to guess what lies ahead. Could anyone?
As a hard core Beatle nut there were times Cynthia annoyed me. Like her statement that John wrote “All My Loving” for her “while I’m away” on tour. And even the changing of Julian’s birth date in her first autobiography, still feeling the need to hide the fact he was conceived out of wedlock. But whose heart could not go out to her when seeing the video of her missing the Maharishi express to Bangor? And the later footage of her traipsing along at a seemingly prescribed distance behind John in Rishikesh?
Her character comes across in her drawings. An innocent, soul, apparently free of all bitterness and cynicism.
Thanks Ian. You are right about her missing the train, an extraordinary portent.
Post a Comment