BOWIE ODYSSEY 76 by Simon Goddard

There was only ever one picture for the front cover of Bowie Odyssey 76, the coolest mug shot ever taken, this one on 21 March in Rochester, NY, after he and others were busted for drugs at the Americana hotel. As is the way with touring musicians, members of his entourage had invited a pair of likely looking girls back to the hotel, perhaps to enjoy a post-gig romp, only to discover they were plain clothes cops out to bust that notorious drug abuser David Bowie who was bound to have a sack of cocaine on his person.

In the event all they found was a bag of marijuana but it was still a pickle that David could do without and it wasn’t the only pickle that David found himself in during 1976. There was a cash-flow problem stemming from his fall out with ex-manager Tony Defries, an ongoing dispute with wife Angie, now largely absent from his life and soon to be shown the door, and an alarming pre-occupation with all things Nazi which, unhappily, coincided with the rise of the English National Front whose cause was championed by a bigoted bus driver called Robert Relf. 

All of this – not least the trials and tribulations of Mr Relf – are covered in forensic detail by Simon Goddard in this most recent episode of his fly-on-the-wall Bowie Odyssey series. As with the previous six books, it’s another eye-opening read, no quarter given as David’s topsy-turvy life is exposed as not quite as wonderful as it might seem to those outside the glass bubble in which he exists. Only two are permitted inside: Coco, his indispensable, devoted handmaiden who tends to his domestic requirements and diary, making sure he’s where and when he’s supposed to be and maybe warming his bed if no other candidates are available, and Jim, aka Iggy, brought on board as a playmate and musical foil, with whom Coco doesn’t necessarily see eye to eye. 

It’s the year of the Thin White Duke, the black and white tour that promoted Station To Station, which is a roaring success and fills empty coffers, and resettlement in Berlin where, having grown an unsightly moustache, David can mingle without being recognised, some of the time anyway. Romy Haag is lurking, England stinks of right wing dung, the punks are waiting in the wings and aside from a pre-occupation with that loathsome Relf fellow, Odyssey 76 is, like 70 to 75, riveting stuff.  

DAVID BOWIE – TEN YEARS GONE (Part 2)

The switch in record labels from RCA to EMI in 1982 saw David Bowie pocket a reputed $17 million advance and move back into the musical mainstream, this time on his own terms. With EMI’s promotional muscle behind it, Let’s Dance (1983), produced by Nile Rodgers, became his best-selling album ever, its funk-driven title track a big hit with an even bigger hook. He was looking different now too, more mature and smartly turned out in stylish pastel suits, business-like yet as attractive as ever, his neatly coiffured blonde hair and easy smile as appealing as the sheen of Let’s Dance tracks like ‘Modern Love’ and ‘China Girl’. The Serious Moonlight tour that followed saw Bowie ever more accomplished on stage, his gift for presentation now executed with effortless panache, a crowd-pleasing spectacle of light, sound, movement and mime, all to accompany a catalogue of wonderful songs played by top class musicians led by guitarist Carlos Alomar. It was this vision of Bowie that in 1985 seduced a worldwide audience of millions at Live Aid, his four-song set during Bob Geldof’s all-star charity extravaganza a highlight of the event and a triumph of mass communication.

        The momentum, however, was not to last. Tonight (1984) failed to match the sparkle of Let’s Dance, presaging an artistic decline that lasted for almost a decade, exacerbated by the disappointing Never Let Me Down (1987) which in the fullness of time Bowie himself would resoundingly disparage. The global success of the new ‘normal’ Bowie, and the less-than-radical soundtrack that accompanied this latest model, proved to be his undoing. In distancing himself from the cutting edge, he fell between two stools, alienating both the new and less critical post-Let’s Dance audience that recoiled at his theatricality while at the same time frustrating the more discerning long-term fans who’d been drawn to his visionary zeal. Matters weren't helped by contractual obligations to a hungry new record label.  

        Bowie’s solution to this dilemma was to form a group, Tin Machine, in which he would claim to be ‘just another member’, an optimistic prospect to say the least. If nothing else the two heavy-handed Tin Machine albums in 1989 and 1991 and subsequent live recording a year later moved Bowie away from the spotlight to lick his wounds. His commercial stock was now at its lowest point since before the Ziggy era but he surprised the world again, not with music but by marrying the Somalian model Iman Mohamed Abdulmajid [1]. Iman clearly inspired the romanticism of Black Tie White Noise (1993) and seemed to finally settle Bowie’s restless spirit and curb his occasional lapses into hedonism.

        Thereafter Bowie’s muse would fluctuate across a series of thoughtful, occasionally acclaimed albums that were never quite as illustrious as those that preceded them but at the same time restored his reputation and sustained it for two further decades. There were tours in which he was never less than immaculately turned out, with favourite songs from the past judiciously blended with newer material and, like many of his peers, he made announcements to the effect that he would no longer play old hits, only to renege on the pledge a year or two later. How could he not perform songs like ‘Starman’ and ‘Heroes’ that had become touchstones in so many lives? How could he top the bill at the Glastonbury festival, as he did in 2000, and not perform songs that the vast audience craved? Some of his later records, Earthling (1997) in particular, were on the experimental side while others, notably hours… (1999) and the enjoyable Heathen (2002), were designed for mass consumption, as was the less successful Reality (2003). 

        To promote Reality Bowie undertook a huge world tour that stretched from 2003 into 2004 but in June of ’04 was abruptly cancelled when he suffered heart problems at Scheeßel in Germany. It is understood that he underwent a heart bypass operation. After surgery, Bowie returned to New York, his home for the past decade, where he would continue to live in relative seclusion for the remainder of his life. 

        From that point on the public was told very little about what was happening in the world of David Bowie. He stopped giving interviews around 2006 and his official website remained silent for extended periods. It was reported that he had declined a knighthood and that he wandered around downtown New York’s galleries and bookshops unrecognised, his preferred disguise on public transport a hat worn low and the pretence of reading a Greek newspaper. Like John Lennon between 1975 and 1980, he lived privately, in an expansive, four-bedroom penthouse in SoHo [2], enjoying his marriage to Iman and raising their daughter, his finances secure thanks to judicious management of his copyrights and assets. Although he made occasional guest appearances, notably with the Canadian rock band Arcade Fire, the long period of inactivity and the knowledge that he’d been a heavy smoker for most of his life fuelled rumours about his failing health. In the words of the noted music critic Charles Shaar Murray, we no longer knew who David Bowie was any more, even if we ever did.

        Since presentation was so crucial to Bowie’s craft it is safe to assume that the reason the world henceforth saw so little of him was because he could no longer present himself on stage or elsewhere in the manner he would prefer. Bowie would no sooner appear as a shadow of his former self than reassume the character of Ziggy Stardust so, rather than appear as someone who no longer resembled the David Bowie that was universally adored, he chose not to appear at all. Age, it seemed, was the great leveller, even for David Bowie. Nevertheless, his absence created a vacuum in which his star continued to shine brightly: the exhibition of his stage outfits and other memorabilia at London’s Victoria & Albert Museum in 2013 attracted record crowds and would tour the world.

        That same year Bowie’s silence was broken dramatically with the unexpected release of The Next Day which took fans and everyone else completely by surprise. In what in hindsight can be seen as another superb piece of media manipulation, as impressive as any in his entire career, its unheralded arrival was a front-page news story in itself, Bowie deriving more publicity by doing absolutely nothing than other top-flight acts receive from the massive, not to mention expensive, advance promotion that is the norm in the 21st Century. A reflective, carefully crafted work, The Next Day won Bowie the Best British Male Solo Artist at the 2014 Brit Awards. The model Kate Moss, wearing one of Bowie’s original Ziggy costumes, picked up the award on his behalf while an enlarged 1973 photo of the real thing, in the identical costume, looked on from above, his arms outstretched and bare legs pinned together as if about to execute a dive into the audience. Best male? No competition, even at 67. 

        Two years later, on January 8, 2016, his 69th birthday, following another period of absolute silence, came the elegiac, brooding Blackstar, a recording which in hindsight seems to have been deliberately designed as a requiem. With lyrics that vaguely referenced his rapidly approaching demise, it will remain a moving, emotional epitaph, intentional in design, a unique and strangely appropriate climax to an extraordinary life.

        David Bowie passed away from cancer of the liver two days later. He’d evidently been diagnosed 18 months earlier and only a tight circle of family and friends knew the extent of his illness. Remarkably, it remained a close secret, so the announcement came as a profound shock to the world and inspired tributes from the high and mighty, fellow musicians and – most notably – multitudes of fans for whom David Bowie represented much more than simply a great rock star but an ideal, a way of life, an incentive to live as you choose and not be cowed by convention. Within hours of the news, these fans, many of them with blue thunderbolts painted on their faces, gathered in their thousands to sing his songs at locations associated with Bowie’s life and career where hastily erected shrines spoke far more about his impact on this world than any of the clichés uttered by the great and the good.

        I was at home in Surrey when I heard the news. The phone rang at 7.15am, unusually early. It was Paul, a local friend and writer of historical romances, telling me that BBC Radio Surrey had called him to ask if he knew how they could get in touch with me. “Why?” I asked. 

        “David Bowie is dead,” he replied.

         It took a moment to sink in and, truth be told, I thought he was saying something about his new record Blackstar, which I’d bought the previous day. 

         “I know,” I said. Then I checked myself. “Dead? That can’t be.”

         “It is, and they want you to call them.”

         “James Cannon?”

         “Yes.”

         I’d met James fairly recently. He and Suzanne Bamborough presented the 6am to 9am show on BBC Radio Surrey & Hampshire. I’d talked to him on air about John Lennon on the 35th anniversary of Lennon’s assassination a few weeks previously.

         So I called James, and began to talk. I fact, I didn’t stop talking about David Bowie until 4 pm in the afternoon about eight hours later, aside from the time spent on the train to London when I tried to gather my thoughts, all the while listening to a hastily-compiled playlist of Bowie music on my iPod. By then my voice had been heard on BBC Breakfast TV over a series of still photographs. This was at 8.20 when I was still in a state of shock, trying hard to sound articulate and not clichéd. This came about simply because someone at Broadcasting House had heard me on Radio Surrey and must have thought I sounded reasonably coherent and knowledgeable. When I thought about it later I realised what a privilege it was to be asked to talk about David Bowie to a watching audience that was probably in the millions. There were lots of people far more qualified than me who could have been invited to talk over the still photographs but I just happened to be available and there was insufficient time to get hold of, say, a producer who'd worked with Bowie in the studio, or a musician from his many bands, or a Bowie biographer. This a link to it:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysudE9-MV2o

        Later, in London, I spoke to a score or more of BBC regional radio stations, firstly from my office and then from Broadcasting House. Much of what I said is part and parcel of what I have written in this blog post. 

         “He was the Hollywood rock star, as untouchable as the great movie stars of the thirties and forties, magnificent, superhuman,” I recall saying. “That is how he will be remembered.” It was a line I reiterated all day, over the phone to presenters up and down the country. After about five or six interviews it became strangely pat, like a mantra, and although I veered off line a bit with some personal reminiscences about meeting Bowie during my years on Melody Maker and working at RCA in the late seventies, it seemed to satisfy everyone.

         This hectic activity lasted from the moment I got up until 4 pm. I didn’t hesitate to consider whether talking about David Bowie was good thing to do or consider the integrity of what I was doing. I was a professional journalist, after all, and the media was my chosen path. It was my job, like it or not. No one offered to pay me for this and, of course, I didn't ask to be paid (though I do when I’m asked to appear in televised documentaries about rock acts). I didn’t have a chance to think really, to sit back and let the news soak in. David Bowie, alas, was dead.

        There was another, slightly surreal, element to all this. On the previous day I had bought Blackstar at Sainsbury’s, along with the week’s shopping. I played it in the car as I drove home, on the CD player in our living room as I read the paper and, having downloaded it on to my iPod, on a docking speaker as my wife and I ate our evening meal. We talked about it too, very atmospheric I thought, not particularly commercial, some lovely melodic moments, a bit jazzy if you consider a honking saxophone ‘jazz’, definitely the kind of album that will grow on me. It was my intention to listen to it more closely in the coming days, on earphones so I could hear the lyrics properly, and do a review on this blog in a day or two’s time. I did catch something in the title track about a single candle, a bit elegiac I thought, but I hadn’t heard enough of the lyrics, all of which I’ve now read more closely, to deduce that it was a farewell letter.

         After we’d listened to it a couple of time I decided to stick with Bowie for the time being and played his achingly lovely version of Paul Simon’s ‘America’ from the Concert For New York City in 2001. He followed this with a majestic, stirring ‘Heroes’ [3], of course, my favourite Bowie song, though ‘Starman’ runs it a close second. We listened to that too, enjoying it as ever. So it was that on January 10, 2016, the day David Bowie died, I had listened to his music all day without realising that he was dead.

        In the second decade of the 21st Century, when performers from rock and roll’s pioneering era seem to pass away with the inevitability of the changing seasons, the loss of David Bowie could be compared only to the deaths of Elvis Presley and John Lennon. “I am not a rock star,” he would repeatedly tell journalists. He was right. He was much more than that; untouchable, perhaps comparable to stars in the old Hollywood sense of the term, perhaps in his daring and ambition beyond compare, shining as brightly as any star on a cloudless night, truly one of the brightest we shall ever see. He’s up there now, looking down on us, and maybe, if you glance skywards and catch a comet flashing across the heavens, you might see David Bowie riding its fiery slipstream, laughing, singing and waving bye-bye, the prettiest pop star of them all. “If we sparkle he might land tonight…”

[1] Iman gave birth to their daughter, Alexandria Zahra Jones, known as Lexi, on 15 August, 2000.

[2] After Bowie’s death in 2016, the penthouse sold for $16.8 million. 

[3] If after reading all this you feel the need for a quick injection of hi-octane Bowie or simply want to remind yourself what all the fuss was about, watch this on Youtube. Along with his Live Aid set, it's as good as it gets. 

DAVID BOWIE - TEN YEARS GONE (Part 1)

DAVID BOWIE

1947-2016

“I pour out what has already been fed in. 

I merely reflect what is going on around me.”

– David Bowie, July 1973.

David Bowie was the most charismatic and influential popular musician of his generation, a cultural polymath and stylistic trailblazer whose artistic breadth also took in theatre, film, video, fashion, mime, fine art and prose writing. Though hugely admired by vast numbers of fans throughout the world, he often seemed uncomfortable with mainstream recognition and throughout his long career made a habit of stepping back to experiment with genres of music and cultural expression unlikely to find commercial acceptance. By refusing to rest on his laurels and – apart from a misstep in the eighties when he courted the mass market to excess – recording a series of peerless albums at various times in his life, he maintained a consistent level of critical acclaim enjoyed by very few of his contemporaries.

        Born David Robert Jones in Brixton in 1947, Bowie paid his dues in a number of groups and guises until his breakthrough in 1969 with the hit single ‘Space Oddity’, perfectly timed to coincide with the American moon landing that same year. The song’s theme of alienation and impending doom would be a recurrent motif of Bowie’s work, alongside a sense of otherworldliness on the part of its creator, as if David Bowie really was from another planet, an alien being on a higher astral plane than mere mortals, someone who simply knew more than the rest of us.

        The new decade brought a change in his business affairs with Bowie, perhaps frustrated by his lack of progress after two early albums, abandoning his dependable but old school manager Kenneth Pitt in favour of the more flamboyant but slightly Machiavellian Tony De Fries. Together they founded a company called Mainman and staffed it with colourful, sexually ambivalent characters whose loyalty to David was never in doubt but whose profligacy would later come back to haunt him. De Fries encouraged his new client to behave like a superstar before he actually was one – “Never, ever, open a door yourself” – thus creating an illusion around Bowie that he was happy to go along with so long as it advanced his career. It turned out to be a Faustian pact but for the time being everyone involved was delighted with the new arrangement and, if nothing else, the Mainman crew certainly enlivened the London rock scene.

        Nevertheless, Bowie’s rise to stardom was not immediate. Though acclaimed by critics, his 1971 albums The Man The Who Sold The World, the cover of which saw him in a ‘man’s dress’, and Hunky Dory sold respectably if not spectacularly. The title song of the former was covered by artists as disparate as Lulu and Kurt Cobain’s Nirvana while the latter contained songs, among them ‘Changes’ and ‘Life On Mars?’, that would remain in his concert repertoire for decades. 

        Bowie’s singing voice was a rich baritone but he could extend his range upwards to tenor and even occasional falsetto. An instinctive rather than virtuoso musician, he played saxophone, guitar and keyboards but his greatest skill was as a songwriter and finding the right collaborators to help realise his compositions. During the making of The Man The Who Sold The World and Hunky Dory he recruited a key early ally in guitarist Mick Ronson who joined his stage group shortly before Bowie renamed them The Spiders From Mars, its leader now restyled as Ziggy Stardust, the ensemble designed to perform his 1972 album named after them. “The two records [the other was Roxy Music’s eponymous debut] torched flower-power for good,” wrote Bowie biographer and critic David Buckley, “replacing it with a confused agenda of post-modern irony and theatricality that became the roots of British art rock.”

The album saw lift-off with Bowie as Ziggy, presenting himself in concert as flamboyantly androgynous, his spiked hair carrot red, his clothes garish and colourful, outré and revealing, his whole demeanour screaming ‘star’ from the highest pinnacle. Crowds flocked to his concerts as he ushered in glam rock yet always maintained a rather aloof presence above the genre’s less cerebral acts like Slade, Sweet and his friend Marc Bolan’s T. Rex. Bowie’s elaborate costumes, many of them Japanese styled, were all part of the same package, in hindsight a work of art in itself. Consciously or not, everything he did from this point onwards became part of his art and his life as an artist. Amongst his greatest early achievements, therefore, was what he saw when he looked at himself in the mirror.

        Crucially, he represented the outsider, positioning himself on the side of those ill-suited for conventional society. His lyrics, often elliptical, spoke to misfits and loners, the timid and the disconnected, enabling them to cast off inhibitions while paving the way for a less macho style of rock performer and performance. A skilled interviewee, he was quick to realise that absolute truth was of less significance than the effect his words might carry. When he did speak to the press he often made headlines, not least in January 1972 when, during an interview with my Melody Maker colleague Michael Watts, he announced that he was gay or, at the very least, bisexual. No one at the time pointed out that he was married with a son [1] yet, in Watt’s opinion, this statement “changed the lifestyles of a generation and kick-started the LGBT movement. He was certainly aware of the impact it would make.” 

        Similarly, on a musical level he positioned himself outside the tried and tested blues rock formula typified by The Rolling Stones or more supercharged contemporaries like Led Zeppelin. While songs such as ‘The Jean Genie’, ‘Suffragette City’ and ‘Rebel Rebel’ – the latter the best Rolling Stones-style song they never recorded – were all full-tilt rockers, others reflected a more ethereal quality, the otherwordly ‘Starman’ borrowing Harold Arlen’s octave climb from ‘Somewhere Over The Rainbow’ to startling effect. ‘Ziggy Stardust’ itself, of course, was assumed to be autobiographical.

        By the end of 1972 Bowie’s only rival as the UK’s biggest solo rock star was Elton John, and though America’s ingrained conservatism at first resisted Bowie’s theatrics, the US fell the following year. He even found time to revive the careers of Lou Reed, producing his Transformer LP containing ‘Walk On The Wild Side’, Reed’s only UK Top Ten hit, and Mott The Hoople, to whom he gifted ‘All The Young Dudes’, their biggest ever hit. Iggy Pop, too, benefited from Bowie’s patronage and became a close friend. 

        Bowie was at the peak of his early fame in 1973, the year his next LP, Aladdin Sane, attracted advance orders of 100,000 in the UK. In many ways it was Ziggy Part II, its striking cover of Bowie with a blue thunderbolt etched across his face solidifying his surreal image. Evidently distrustful of flying, he toured the world by land and sea with an extravagant entourage, crossing the Atlantic and Pacific by ocean liner and Russia, from Vladivostok to Moscow, by rail, but his biggest UK concert to date, which originated London’s Earls Court as a rock venue, was a disaster, the blame attached to his management for skimping on amplification, presentation and security. It was an omen of things to come. 

        In July 1973, just as it seemed as if Bowie would eclipse all before him, he abandoned the persona of Ziggy Stardust completely, memorably making the announcement from the stage at Hammersmith Odeon, shocking fans and, so word had it, even his own group, and returned to the drawing board. It would not be the only time that Bowie would abruptly spring an unexpected surprise, a career strategy he maintained until the very end.

        The patchy covers album Pin Ups (1973) was a holding manoeuvre but with Diamond Dogs (1974), and perhaps more importantly its concurrent stage show, Bowie invented rock theatre, a style of presentation that paid no lip service whatsoever to conventional rock concerts and instead relied purely on dramatic effect and elaborate stage props. “The one-and-a-half-hour, 20-song show is a completely rehearsed and choreographed routine where every step and nuance has been perfected down to the last detail,” I wrote in Melody Maker after seeing a concert in Toronto. “There isn’t one iota of spontaneity about the whole show. It is straight off a musical stage – a piece of theatre, complete with extravagant mechanical sets, dancers and a band that stands reservedly to stage right and never even receives so much as a cursory acknowledgement, like an orchestra in a theatre pit.” Kate Bush and Madonna took notes.

        The following year Bowie embraced blue-eyed soul with Young Americans, its funked-up US No. 1 hit single ‘Fame’ a collaboration with his new friend John Lennon that savaged his relationship with manager Tony De Fries. “By crossing over into disco/soul music he helped pave the way for the greater commercial success later in the decade of the Bee Gees,” wrote Buckley. “The Bowie model of white, blue-eyed soul would be hugely influential for the likes of ABC, Spandau Ballet and Simply Red as the eighties unwound, and British soul boys and girls everywhere have this pioneering album to thank.”

        He then stepped back from music to appear in Nicolas Roeg’s sci-fi film The Man Who Who Fell To Earth. It was astute casting, Bowie’s starring role as an extra-terrestrial sent to earth to save his own planet serving only to ramp up the impression of Bowie as a creature from beyond the stratosphere. As his career progressed he would accept roles in several more films, often as anomalous or quirky characters. 

        Bowie was reaching another plateau and it was around this time that I made his acquaintance, socially at music industry events in New York, where I was stationed as Melody Maker’s US correspondent, and professionally during a lengthy interview in a hotel room in Detroit in 1976. “In his blue tracksuit he looks astonishingly healthy and although he could add a few pounds in weight his brain is as trim as his figure,” I wrote in MM. “His hair, blond at the front and red at the back, has been groomed by his personal hairdresser, and is swept up in a quiff. His classic, Aryan features alternate between expressions of genuine warmth and cold contempt whenever he senses troubled waters. His left eye is still strangely immobile, a legacy from the childhood injury he received, and it adds an incongruous touch to his rather aristocratic bearing. Even if David Bowie never opened his mouth, he would have found some niche in life purely on the strength of his looks.”

        It was during this interview that Bowie told me he was broke, clearly an exaggeration, and – as with the “I’m gay” admission in 1972 – designed to capture a headline. I didn’t mind. Obtaining good quotes was part and parcel of being a good reporter, though later in the same interview David denied ever being gay in the first place. “That was just a lie,” he said. “They gave me that image so I stuck to it pretty well for a few years. I never adopted that stance. It was given to me. I’ve never done a bisexual action in my life, onstage, record or anywhere else.”

        I suppose I was part of the conspiracy though anyone who had the good fortune to spend time with David Bowie will tell you that he could be the most gracious of men, well-mannered, well-spoken and utterly charming. Far and away the best-looking rock star in the world, women adored him. Most would have been willing to leap into bed with him at a moment’s notice, and Bowie wasn’t one to let such opportunities slip by. An avid book reader who took the acquisition of arcane knowledge very seriously, he could converse in an interesting way on all manner of subjects which probably explains why of all the rock stars I interviewed between 1970 and 1977 he was one of only two – the other was Pete Townshend – who asked me questions as the conversation proceeded. 

“Seen any good bands recently, Chris?” he might ask. “Read any good books? Seen any good movies? Visited a new gallery?” An unapologetic culture vulture, it was his way of absorbing information that might come in useful at a later date, regardless of the source. If he was obliged to submit to an interview, he figured he might as well derive more from it than a page or two in a magazine or newspaper, hopefully with his picture on the cover.

He probably learned how to grab headlines from John Lennon, who learned it the hard way when he implied The Beatles were more popular than Jesus. When I asked David if Lennon played a big role in the writing of ‘Fame’ he was dismissive. “No, not really,” he replied frankly. “I think he appreciates that. It was more the influence of having him in the studio that helped. There’s always a lot of adrenalin flowing when John is around, but his chief addition to it all was the high-pitched singing of ‘Fame’. The riff came from Carlos [Alomar], and the melody and most of the lyrics came from me, but it wouldn’t have happened if John hadn’t been there. He was the energy, and that’s why he’s got a credit for writing it; he was the inspiration.”

My interview with Bowie took place during the Station To Station tour, a series of concerts built around the album of the same name that merged black funk with the emerging European electronic school. I share the widely held view that it is his best ever. He appeared on stage as the title track’s Thin White Duke character, in black pants, black waistcoat and white shirt, with bright white strip lighting illuminating the stage. The only hint of colour was the blue packet of Gitanes in his vest pocket from which he plucked cigarettes to smoke between songs. Smoking was cool then. Amazingly, the show was preceded by a screening of the 1929 surrealist short film Un Chien Andalou by Salvador Dali and Luis Buñuel, in which a woman’s eye is slashed by a razor blade; not really the sort of thing US fans would expect at a rock show. I read later that Madonna, aged 17, was at the concert I saw, her first ever rock show. 

        Station To Station is as timeless as it is flawless; yet the thrillingly successful world arena tour that followed would presage Bowie’s second retreat from the commercial sphere. Destabilised by the financially calamitous fall out with De Fries – following Lennon’s advice he would henceforth largely manage his own business affairs in tandem with lawyers and discrete, no-nonsense personal assistant Corinne ‘Coco’ Schwab – and an enervating cocaine habit, he wisely relocated to Berlin to work with producer/auteur Brian Eno on a trilogy of introverted experimental albums, thus maintaining his reputation as a genuine innovator and simultaneously avoiding the need to compete with punk rock. Although many tracks on these now highly acclaimed records were doom-laden instrumentals and perversely uncommercial, the Berlin period produced the stirring majesty of ‘Heroes’, a meditation on the futility of the Berlin Wall that is arguably the finest song he ever wrote and certainly the most popular.

        After emerging from his German retreat for another arena tour, Scary Monsters And Super Creeps (1980) saw Bowie move to more conventional ground, its most affecting track ‘Ashes To Ashes’ a revision of the Major Tom saga from ‘Space Oddity’. By this time videos – short films to promote singles – had arrived and few benefited more from this development than Bowie whose acting experience gave him the jump on less imaginative fellow travellers. The video for ‘Ashes To Ashes’, with Bowie in Pierrot costume, not only lit the touch paper beneath the New Romantic movement but ushered in an era when he consistently led the field in this new art form. As if to prove the point, his next move, again unexpected, was to appear on stage – bravely and with distinction – in Chicago and on Broadway in New York as the severely deformed John Merrick in The Elephant Man, a role that required him to contort his frame throughout the play’s duration.

        By this time, I had left Melody Maker and was working in the press office at RCA Records in London, a job that required me to represent Bowie to the media, hardly onerous as by now he was living permanently in New York. I took a couple of journalists to Chicago to watch The Elephant Man, one of whom, Angus McKinnon from New Musical Express, defied the instructions of Bowie’s “people” and succeeded in interviewing him for considerably longer than the allotted hour, much to their annoyance. He also took along his own photographer, the soon-to-be-celebrated Anton Corbijn. The following week – the week that Scary Monsters was released – NME had a Corbijn picture of Bowie on the cover and five pages of McKinnon’s interview inside. Unlike his advisors, Bowie was already familiar with Corbijn’s work and, as I suspected, knew far better than them how to achieve maximum coverage.

        I watched Bowie on stage in The Elephant Man for three straight nights as he contorted his body for the role and spoke with a strange, high-pitched accent in imitation of the real John Merrick. I came away hugely impressed, as did all the theatre critics who reviewed the play when it transferred to New York for a further three months. 

        This experience confirmed in my mind that David Bowie was a true polymath and I am thankful for the slight relationship I had with him at this time. Unfortunately, I had no further dealings with him as he left RCA for EMI soon afterwards. 

[Part Two Tomorrow] 

[1] In March 1970 Bowie married Angela Barnett, a Cypriot American model and fashion designer, who in May of 1971 gave birth to a son they named Zowie. In the fullness of time he would alter his name to Duncan Jones. Angie and Bowie separated in the mid-seventies and were divorced in 1980.

The framed photograph at the top of this post was taken in 1973 by my friend Barrie Wentzell, Melody Maker’s staff photographer from 1965 until 1975. It hangs on the wall at the base of the stairs that lead up to my office in our home.   

BOWIE ODYSSEY 75 by Simon Goddard

It is January 1975, cold outside, and 61-year-old Mrs Margaret Jones, Peggy to her friends, is shopping in Sainsburys in Beckenham, not displeased to be recognised by fans of her son David but still wishing he’d get in touch more often. The £3,000 mink coat he bought her for Christmas hangs unworn in her wardrobe, and stays that way, even when Angie, her daughter-in-law, accompanies her to the Ideal Home Exhibition at Olympia. She cries when she plays his records. 

        David, meanwhile, is in New York, recording at Electric Ladyland studios with no lesser accompanist than Dr Winston O’Boogie, who having lately duelled with Allen Klein is offering advice on two issues: how David can disentangle himself from manager Tony Defries and how to inject the correct thump into ‘Fame’, the single that will place him at the top of the US Billboard charts later in the year. 

Thus begins Bowie Odyssey ’75, the sixth instalment in Simon Goddard’s series of 10 fly-on-the-wall books, each one dedicated to a single year in the decade that announced Bowie to the world. It’s all here: Young Americans, playing Thomas Newton in The Man Who Fell To Earth, the fall out with Deep Freeze (as we used to call him), the toxic, narcotic-fuelled stay in Los Angeles, Iggy in and out of his life, the Bay City Rollers, Patti Smith and nascent Sex Pistols, and hints of the recording of Station To Station, his masterpiece; all played out against a backdrop that sees the emergence of Thatcher, the Cambridge Rapist and serial killer Patrick Mackay, a trio of villains, the first of whom bears an uncanny similarity to the Thin White Duke, as demonstrated in photos of both, cunningly printed opposite one another on pages 4 and 5 of the photo section. I found that slightly disturbing, which I guess is how Simon Goddard intended me to find it 

As I pointed out in a review of Bowie Odyssey ’73 elsewhere on this blog, Goddard’s books in this unique series are not biographies in the accepted sense but attempts to get inside Bowie’s head while at the same time place him squarely amidst all that was going on at the same time elsewhere, much of it unpleasant. The language is sharp, forthright, uncontaminated by anything that might ease a troubled mind, so much so that at the start of each book there is a warning that its contents might offend those of tender sensibilities, noting that they depict “prevailing attitudes of the time” and are included “for reasons of historical context in order to accurately describe the period concerned”. 

Well, they ain’t kidding. Like the others in the series I’ve read so far – all of them actually, Odysseys 70, 71, 72, 73 and 74 – Bowie Odyssey ’75 spares no blushes, whether it be Bowie’s bonkers behaviour, not least his fixation with Nazi Germany, obscure religious texts and keeping bottles of his wee in the fridge, his nomadic lifestyle and fury at Defries (the legal battle is wonderfully depicted as a boxing commentary), all you know about and quite a lot you probably didn’t, right down to the modus operandi of Peter Samuel Cook, aka the Cambridge Rapist. 

After a terrorising ride through the canyons of Los Angeles, skidding through mountains of cocaine, the book closes with a furious row between Angie, queen no more, and Corinne, aka ‘Coco’, David’s trusty girl Friday, who – as Goddard so decorously puts it, does everything but ascend to the top job, “the warmer of his bedsheets”. 

        It doesn’t take long to read these books but that’s not the point. They simply home in on their targets with uncanny accuracy even if you do come away thinking it really wasn’t much fun being David Bowie during the 1970s. Recommended. 

BOWIE ODYSSEY ’73 by Simon Goddard

It is unusual to begin a series at the fourth episode but that is what I’ve inadvertently done with Bowie Odyssey ’73, the fourth in Simon Goddard’s ambitious sequence of books that, year by year, will chart David Bowie’s progress throughout the decade he made his own, one book per year, hopefully, up to 1980. 

        The project’s ambition is matched only by the sumptuousness of Goddard’s writing. These are not biographies in the accepted sense, researched through interviews with those on the side-lines collated alongside details of events like record releases and concerts, all glossed up with the author’s own take or critique on things. No, they are attempts to get inside Bowie’s head and observe things from his and everyone else’s perspective, in this case a heap of folk with whom Bowie associated; wife Angie, Spiders and other musicians, maverick manager Tony Defries and his flamboyant Mainman assistants, clothes designers, hairdressers, friends old and new, fans, and, last but by no means least, lovers, of whom there are several: take a bow Amanda, Marianne and Lulu to name but three. 

        This kind of writing is not new but is nevertheless quite rare, and it takes a good deal of skill to pull it off. The late great Nick Tosches succeeded to a certain extent with his wonderful Jerry Lee Lewis biography Hellfire, and to an even greater degree in Dino: Living High In The Dirty Business of Dreams, his astonishing excavation into the life of Dean Martin. The master, of course, was Hunter S. Thompson, who placed himself at the centre of the stories he wrote in a style that became known as gonzo journalism.

        Simon Goddard does not place himself within Bowie’s orbit, which, because he wasn’t there, would be foolish, but instead walks a mile in the shoes of those who were. Eschewing any hint of musical criticism or analysis, Goddard has produced 150-odd pages of fly-on-the-wall reportage, scrupulously researched through interviews with the flies but in place of the usual quotes from interested observers we have the actual conversations, real or imagined, all combined with vivid descriptions of time and place. He can’t know for sure what Bowie was thinking, or feeling, or saying, but his assumptions ring true time and time again. At times as I read Bowie Odyssey ’73 I felt like his shadow.

        David Bowie’s life in 1973 was nothing less than hectic, chaotic even. Ziggy was on his final tour, in the US, Japan and UK; his Earls Court show was a humiliating disaster; he travelled everywhere by land, across the USSR by rail; Aladdin Sane and Pin-Ups were recorded and released, four singles appeared too, one of them, to his deep annoyance, ‘The Laughing Gnome’; the Bowies were itinerant, rarely home but moving house more than once; Angie was hankering after equal billing; money was recklessly squandered, not least by manager Defries; cocaine arrived; fans with thunderbolts across their faces were everywhere he went. Snapping at his heels were Roxy Music and Slade, with Marc fading and pretenders galore waiting in the wings to render glam rock artless. In the real world there were strikes, the Lambton sex scandal and the marriage of HRH Anne, among much more. It’s a rich stew and Simon Goddard does the ingredients justice, blending all into a genuine page-turner. 

        There are hints, too, of things to come: financial woes, the arrival in Bowie’s midst of a nondescript girl who will, in time, prove indispensable, and a bold idea involving a theatrical presentation based on Orwell’s 1984. 

        That’ll have to wait until Bowie Odyssey ’74. Bring it on, and in the meantime I’m turning back to ’70, ’71 and ’72. 

        (Bowie Odyssey ’74 is published by Omnibus Press, and has an eight-page photo section; RRP £16.99, £12.76 on Amazon)

MONEY, MONEY, MONEY

The news that David Bowie’s heirs have sold the rights to his music for something in the region of $250 million comes as no surprise to me. His catalogue is just the latest in a long line of work by ‘heritage’ acts, some dead, some alive, whose music has been snapped up by large corporations in the hope they’ll get their money back many times over through streaming, dwindling sales of CDs, mechanical copyright earnings, song publishing revenues and exploitation in movies, TV and advertising usage.

        Some people ask why. My guess is that David’s widow Imam, now in her sixties, their daughter Lexi, and David’s son Duncan Jones, simply don’t want to be bothered with the effort and expense involved in exercising control over the music that their husband and father left behind. Far better to bank (and enjoy) the money than to spend years fretting over how best to administer and make use of the legacy themselves. This would require difficult decisions, loads of meetings, reams of paperwork, expensive lawyers and constant policing, a heap of headaches best left in the hands of persons better qualified for this kind of work than themselves. Banking a pirate’s treasure certainly looks like the better option to me. 

        I find it less surprising that Bowie’s heirs have taken this decision than the similar deals that have been made by artists still living. Bruce Springsteen remains creative into his seventies, one of few big acts of his generation to maintain a steady output of quality new material, so the reason for his decision to sell, along with, say, Neil Young, another perennial achiever – who sold 50% of his catalogue about a year ago – is less clear. It’s not as if Bruce needs the money, topping the list with a reputed $500 million in his case, and I’ve long maintained the view, perhaps naively, that he was never in it for the money in the first place. Maybe he just wants to make sure that none of his descendants wind up like father Doug, bitter and twisted after years in that dead-end factory job, his anger and frustration the source of so many of his son’s songs.

        In fact, the list of acts who’ve sold their catalogues is virtually endless. Anyone interested can visit a website* which lists 54 acts, ranging from Bob Dylan to Bing Crosby, most with the price attached, and a further thirty-odd who’ve sold portions of their catalogues for undisclosed sums. I don’t think it’s a complete list either, as there’s no sign of Pete Townshend on it, nor of Dusty Springfield who, unless I’m mistaken, was one of the first artists to enter into this kind of deal, thus ensuring she could spend her final years without a care in the world at a very pleasant cottage near Henley. 

        It’s perhaps more pertinent to note who hasn’t sold their work, and there are some big names holding out, all of them British, which suggests that American acts are more inclined to bank the cash than the Brits. Paul McCartney isn’t on the list, and neither are The Rolling Stones, Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin, Ray Davies, Elton John or Rod Stewart. U2 and R.E.M. are also absent. It might be the case that some act’s catalogues aren’t theirs to sell, insofar as somewhere along the line they lost control of their work or, like Elvis – see below – were swindled out of it by some nefarious wheeler-dealer. Asked recently about the issue, Elton’s manager David Furnish said it was “unthinkable” for his client and partner to sell his songs, adding: “I can’t think of anything more agonising, and neither can Elton, than sitting and watching someone else take his and Bernie [Taupin’s] songs and do what they want with them.”

        I know, or I think I know, how that might feel. David would certainly wince if an enterprising confectionary brand launched a chocolate bar called Heroes and promoted it with David’s song of the same name, or a toy company produced an astronaut doll they called The Starman. 

        All of this ties in quite neatly into a book I’m reading right now called Leaving The Building: The Lucrative Afterlife of Music Estates by Eamonn Forde, a music biz expert whose last book The Final Days of EMI: The Selling Of The Pig I edited while at Omnibus Press. Leaving The Building takes as its starting point the remarkable rehabilitation of Elvis Presley’s estate which, at the time of his death in 1977, was almost threadbare, at least by the standards you would expect of a singer who’d sold nigh on a billion records in his lifetime.  

        Though it’s likely he didn’t realise what was going on, Elvis was quite probably the first artist to enter into a deal along the lines of the one that David Bowie’s heirs have just concluded. In 1972, with sales of Elvis’ records in terminal decline, Col Tom Parker, his manager, reached an agreement with RCA Records that he and Elvis would relinquish all future royalties on Elvis’ back catalogue sales in exchange for $5 million in cash that was split 50/50 between them. Naturally Elvis paid tax on his share – leaving him with just over $1 million for his life’s work, a paltry sum in view of its significance and heritage. From RCA’s point of view, however, this deal was as sweet as they come – they now owned Elvis’ back catalogue outright – and for Parker the deal provided a handsome nest egg for his eventual retirement. 

        Happily, Priscilla Presley, acting on behalf of their daughter Lisa Marie, rescued the estate – and turned around that awful deal with RCA – but that didn’t stop Lisa from selling out eventually anyway.

        I called this post Money, Money, Money, after the song by Abba, another act whose catalogue is doubtless worth a nine-figure sum. So I’ll close by mentioning that Voyage became the fastest-selling album of 2021, which can’t have done their stock price any harm at all. When Björn and Benny decide the time is right, will Abba’s catalogue top Bruce’s $500 mil? My money says it will. 

*https://www.ajournalofmusicalthings.com/heres-a-running-list-of-artists-who-have-sold-some-or-all-of-their-song-catalogues-to-a-new-breed-of-company/

MY STINT AS MM’S MAN IN AMERICA Part 25 – 1974 continued.

Shortly before Diamond Dogs was released in late May I had been summoned by David Bowie’s ‘people’ to Mainman’s New York HQ to listen to it. Tony De Fries, Bowie’s manager, firmly believed that to be a star, you must look and behave like one, even if you are not, and since by now David certainly was a star, the circus surrounding him was bordering on the absurd, on a par with the Pope or HRH Elizabeth II. To this end I was restricted to a single hearing of Diamond Dogs, not allowed to record it – I was temporarily relieved of my cassette recorder – just take notes, and generally treated like some sort of sub-species by the unpleasant people that worked for Mainman, one of whom lingered as I listened, observing me as a warder might an errant prisoner. 

        In these circumstances reviewing a record isn’t easy, and I wasn’t even given a lyric sheet, so to come up with 900 words, as I managed to do, was quite an achievement. “Bowie’s new album really is excellent,” I wrote, not my most insightful review, when I returned to the flat and read back my scribbled notes. “It’s a departure from his previous records in that the Spiders are no longer with him, and it’s also a departure in that the whole production of the songs is far more lavish than anything he’s previously attempted. For most of the tracks, he’s adopted a ‘wall of sound’ technique, borrowed not a little from Phil Spector, but the richness of it all enhances his voice no end. He’s also moved further into rock and roll – there’s hardly a slow song on the album – and played all the chunky guitar licks himself, according to the sleeve credits.”

        Because of the almost paranoid secrecy surrounding David and his activities, I wasn’t to know that this record would form the basis of a new stage show set to open in Canada in June. The last time I’d seen David Bowie in person was on stage at the Hammersmith Odeon on July 3 of the previous year, the night he announced that the Spiders were breaking up, shocking everyone present, including the Spiders themselves. Now I was invited to the O’Keefe Centre in Toronto to review the third show of his Diamond Dogs Revue tour on June 16, along with a party of other music writers, all of us convinced after the concert that Bowie had re-invented the concept of rock theatre. 

        It could be argued that Alice Cooper started it all but, compared to what David did on this tour, Alice was a Punch & Judy Show. It being a Sunday night I had to write up my longish review very quickly, in longhand on hotel notepaper, then wait until about four in the morning to call London (10am UK time) and dictate 1,600 words over the phone to Marilyne, Ray Coleman’s secretary, who was also Mrs Chris Welch. We’d progressed from carrier pigeons but e-mails were as remote as Major Tom. It filled page three of that week’s MM.

        “A few thousand lucky Canadians witnessed a completely new concept in rock theatre when David Bowie opened his North American tour in Toronto on Sunday,” I wrote. “It now seems likely that Bowie was speaking the truth when he announced his retirement from rock on the stage at the Hammersmith Odeon last year. For the act that David presents on this tour has as much to do with rock and roll as Bob Dylan has with the gloss of Los Vegas.

         “The one-and-a-half-hour, 20-song show is a completely rehearsed and choreographed routine where every step and nuance has been perfected down to the last detail. There isn’t one iota of spontaneity about the whole show. It is straight off a musical stage – a piece of theatre, complete with extravagant mechanical sets, dancers and a band that stands reservedly to stage right and never even receives so much as a cursory acknowledgement, like an orchestra in a theatre pit.

         “The show belongs on Broadway or Shaftesbury Avenue rather than on the road. The whole concept takes a complete turnaround from what a rock audience anticipates, but at Toronto on Sunday it left them stunned. Perhaps the crowd at the O’Keefe Theatre literally couldn’t believe their eyes… not once did Bowie address the audience, or even allude to their presence other than an odd grin… He was dressed in a light grey suit with blue and white polka dot, collarless shirt, and red braces. He retained the same outfit for the entire performance, apart from removing his jacket. He appeared without any noticeable make-up and gone was the spiky hair style of last year and the year before. In its place was a neat parting; it left little doubt about the masculinity of the performer.

         “Fittingly there was no encore and the applauding audience was greeted with the announcement 10 minutes after the show stopped that Bowie had already left the theatre. The Colonel Parker touch is forever there.”

This show never came to the UK. I would see it again at Madison Square Garden on July 19 but the theatrics didn’t really work in an arena and it wasn’t long before the expensive props were put away for good. In the meantime, Bowie’s band – led by session bassist Herbie Flowers – had threatened to go on strike after a show in Philadelphia was recorded and they received no additional remuneration. It was released as David Live. 

        Without the props, the tour continued on the West Coast, merging the Diamond Dogs songs with David's increasing interest in soul music, after which he retired to Los Angeles to lick his wounds, anaesthetising them with cocaine. The following year he released his blue-eyed soul LP Young Americans, its funked-up US No. 1 hit single ‘Fame’ a collaboration with John Lennon that savaged his relationship with manager De Fries.

        In 1976 Station To Station, my choice for his best ever LP, merged black funk with the emerging European electronic school, and in Detroit during a thrillingly successful world arena tour that year I would sit down and discuss his career in one of the longest interviews that David ever gave, of which more later. I wasn’t to know it but Madonna, then aged 17, was in the audience for the March 1 concert that I saw. It was, she said later, the first rock show she’d ever attended. For all I know I might have sat next to her. 

KEN PITT (1922-2019)

I was saddened to hear of the death last month of Ken Pitt, best known as  the manager of David Bowie from 1965 until 1969. Ken and I got to know one another in 1985 when Omnibus Press published a paperback edition of his book Bowie: The Pitt Report, an account of the period when he managed David during which, for a short while, they shared a flat near Manchester Square in central London.

         Ken was a courteous and cultured man, a veteran of the music industry who did his best not to sound aggrieved by the fact that David Bowie had abandoned him for the indelicate and far more scheming Tony Defries, or Deep Freeze as we were inclined to call him on Melody Maker in the early seventies. Defries put Bowie on the map but at considerable cost as the two would eventually fall out over money matters in circumstances best described as fraught.

         Nevertheless, Bowie had much to thank Ken Pitt for. It was Ken who turned David onto the first album by the Velvet Underground, whose music so influenced his own, and encouraged him to broaden his skills by branching out into acting, theatre and mime. Recognising that David was more than simply a rock’n’roll singer, he booked him to appear on European song festivals and saw nothing wrong when the songs he wrote and recorded leaned more towards mannered ballads than the pop mainstream. Ken was still managing Bowie at the time of his first hit ‘Space Oddity’ in the autumn of 1969 but they parted company soon afterwards.

         Born in 1922, Ken was well versed in the machinations of the music industry by the time he encountered Bowie. He first worked in music as a publicist, promoting tours by visiting US jazz and folk performers, including Duke Ellington and Bob Dylan’s earliest UK tours, and he also managed Manfred Mann at the start of their career, along with Crispian St Peters and Goldie & The Gingerbreads.

         Having befriended Ken through publishing the re-issue of his book, we stayed in touch and, indeed, for many years I acted as a conduit for him since anyone seeking to find him – usually writers – made me, as his publisher, their first port of call. He lived in Spain for much of the year until he retired to a senior community in Hertfordshire where I knew his phone number and address. Ken swore me to secrecy and, though some of those wanting to interview him – usually TV people or reporters from downmarket tabloid newspapers – were quite indignant when I refused to reveal his contact details, I never betrayed his whereabouts. I would pass on requests, usually by enclosing them in a letter as he eschewed e-mails, and leave it up to him to respond or not. Invariably he didn’t. For many years we exchanged Christmas cards and Ken once told me that from the Let’s Dance era onwards David always sent him a Christmas present, usually a small ceramic ornament.

         One interview request to which he did respond was my own when in 2003 Q magazine commissioned me to write about Bowie’s relationship with the press for a DB special edition. Here’s a transcription of the phone conversation we had.

         CC: Why is it that David has such a good rapport with the media and knows how to manipulate it so well?

         KP: When I started he knew nothing about it. He’s got to take the credit because he had a lot of natural charm. One lady who fell for him was Penny Valentine and also George Tremlett. It got around amongst journalists that he was a very bright boy, a lot of fun to interview.

         CC: Did you tutor him in dealing with the media?

         KP: He would always listen to me when I was on the phone when I was taking about PR and giving advice to people. Also, he was very nosy… inquisitive, always looking at papers on my desk. That’s how I discovered his Anthony Newley fixation... he saw a poster for Stop The World I Want To Get Off and asked me about it. I certainly gave him advice from the very beginning. He was anxious about what to say. I would tell him exactly what the interviewer’s interests were, and I told him that whatever you do, don’t argue, don’t get into a heated conversation. I never put him up to saying anything that wasn’t true. I told him you’ve got to try to anticipate the interviewer, tell him or her what they want to hear, and adopt a different style according to the different types of media.

         CC: Do you think he was ambivalent about telling the truth?

         KP: Yes. He certainly wasn’t broke [a reference to an MM interview I did with DB in 1976 in which he said the only reason he was touring was because he needed the money].

         CC: How did you feel about him coming out as gay?

         KP: I wasn’t at all happy when the ‘I’m Gay’ interview appeared. It wasn’t the kind of thing I would have advised him to do. I had been observing what was going on in San Francisco, how gays were creating comfortable housing out of slums, designing clothes, going into business and flourishing. I could see how the gay scene was changing and I realised it would happen here eventually. And I knew that if the right kind of artist was to talk about this with great sincerity it would break down all the barriers. That’s why we did the interview with Jeremy… a dreadful magazine. I was horrified by the Michael Watts interview [in Melody Maker, January 1972], and the fact that it was repeated in the Evening Standard that night.

         CC: How it is that he has managed to maintain such a good relationship with the press.

         KP: He’s interesting to talk to and he gives interesting answers to questions. I think the reason why David has managed to maintain a good relationship with the media is his ability to reinvent himself. He’s never boring.

         Ken lived to be 96, dying after a short illness.